D-Link Forums
The Graveyard - Products No Longer Supported => D-Link NetDefend Firewalls => Topic started by: weweird on February 22, 2010, 09:19:35 AM
-
Hello.
I have an ISA Server 2006 at main office and a DFL-210 at Branch office.
I need to connect branch office to main office by site-to-site sheme.
But i have one small nuance: at branch office i cant get public IP address.
So i cant use IPSEC tunneling mode.
But i cant find any solution or step-by-step instruction or how-to use L2TP over IPSEC CLIENT in DFL-210.
What I've already done:created site-to-site network on ISA,
on DFL-210 created IPSEC in transport mode
(http://xmages.net/upload/4dd5fca2.png)(http://xmages.net/upload/9f07be5c.png)
and L2TP client
(http://xmages.net/upload/84f20a8a.png)
tic "Automatically add a route for this interface using the given remote network."
and "Add route for remote network"
SA successfully established but only when i ping from DFL-210 to udp port 1701 of ISA,
L2TP client stay in state
Type : Single client tunnel
Sessions : 1
Tunnel status : Connecting
Session status : Establishing
And in ISA Monitoring - there is no connecting to port 1701 (except udp ping).
I need help because i dont know where to look now...
And sorry for my bad english.
-
You don't need an SA per port, lease it at the default.
I have never personally set up this config (it is kind of backwards to how most people use this device) so while I see nothing (else) immediately wrong I would take a careful look at your logs and make sure you use all the clues your devices are going to give you.
-
Hi Fatman.
If i set SA "Per net" or "Per host" i get Quick Mode failed
2010-02-22 21:53:28: IkeSnoop: Received IKE packet from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:500
Exchange type : Informational
ISAKMP Version : 1.0
Flags : E (encryption)
Cookies : 0xcd41f1c17c942c60 -> 0xb3c791fbba607238
Message ID : 0xf6a4a00a
Packet length : 64 bytes
# payloads : 2
Payloads:
HASH (Hash)
Payload data length : 16 bytes
N (Notification)
Payload data length : 12 bytes
Protocol ID : ESP
Notification : Invalid ID information
Don't you know, is L2TP-over-IPSEC is generally possible ?
-
No reason it shouldn't be, but as I said this is the first time I have seen it used in this direction.
Does either side use custom IPsec IDs? Have you tried custom IPsec IDs?
-
Yes i tried - no luck.
in ISA's Quick Mode policy filters
there is filter,that allow only port "any" to "1701". So i think "per port" SA is the only way to make it works...
-
That should not be what that means.