D-Link Forums
The Graveyard - Products No Longer Supported => D-Link Storage => DNS-323 => Topic started by: lookingforinfo on July 07, 2010, 09:23:30 AM
-
I have my DNS-323 working with my OS X system through the GUI interface. I am now trying to mount the device at the command prompt and I am receiving the message "Authentication error". I have tried it numerous times and it can not be a typo every time.
My environment is OS X 10.6.4; DNS-323 is at FW 1.08.
Prior to testing I created a mount point with "mkdir /volumes/dlink"
I have tried both mount -t smbf and mount_smbf. The mount_smbf command was
mount_smbf //username:userpw@192.168.1.102/Volume_1 /volumes/dlink
The full reply message was:
mount_smbfs: server rejected the connection: Authentication error
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
-
Some additional information to my original post. I have noticed that the mount point I created, /Volumes/dlink was created with a "+" at the end of the permissions to indicate that it was part of OS X Access Control Lists. When I moved the mount point to ~/mnt I still received the same message that the server rejected the connection: Authentication error.
To gunrunnerjohn, I have also tried ...@192.168.1.102/mnt/HD_2a in place of ...@192.168.1.102/Volume_1. I get the same results.
-
I would like to close this topic and report that I have solved the problem. I can now use a Mac OS X terminal session and mount a volume on my DNS-323. To the mount statement I added two options, nodev and nosuid, and substituted the device name I assigned to the DNS-323 for its IP address. The mount command is:
mount_smbfs -o nodev,nosuid //username:userpw@devicename/Volume_1/directory ~/mnt
Since Time Machine will not work without hacks, I plan to use the BSD commands within OS X to schedule jobs that will copy and compress directories on the Mac and write them to the DNS-323. On a different schedule, I plan to copy the compresses files on Volume_1 to Volume_2. Yes, I still have to worry about the house burning down, so I will address that issue in the future.
Lastly, I want to thank gunrunnerjohn for posting his views on why not to use Raid 1.
Peace..