D-Link Forums

The Graveyard - Products No Longer Supported => Routers / COVR => DIR-655 => Topic started by: GJones on August 17, 2007, 08:44:56 PM

Title: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: GJones on August 17, 2007, 08:44:56 PM
I've been trying to use my super G card (DWL-G520) so my son can have a wireless connection to my new DIR-655.  When I do, everything slows down to 54 (regular G speeds).  I have this sinking feeling that the DIR-655 isn't truly compatible with all my old DLink 108 super G equipment.

Somebody tell me I'm wrong!  How do I make the DIR-655 run in super G mode with my super G stuff?
???
Jones
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: Fatman on August 20, 2007, 09:19:13 AM


The DIR-655 is not Super G it is Draft N.  This means that your Super G devices will connect at 54 Mbps (MAX) and will slow your network to 54Mbps.
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: on August 20, 2007, 11:52:53 AM
I've been trying to use my super G card (DWL-G520) so my son can have a wireless connection to my new DIR-655.  When I do, everything slows down to 54 (regular G speeds).  I have this sinking feeling that the DIR-655 isn't truly compatible with all my old DLink 108 super G equipment.

Somebody tell me I'm wrong!  How do I make the DIR-655 run in super G mode with my super G stuff?
???
Jones

Fat Man is right.

You can't run your cards in super G mode.

Why did you buy a new N router with out getting  N adapters?
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: GJones on August 20, 2007, 04:54:50 PM
Fat Man is right.

You can't run your cards in super G mode.

Why did you buy a new N router with out getting  N adapters?

Well that's dissappointing.  I was suspecting that the N router wouldn't support Extreme or super G.  I found a PCI N adaptor for his computer.  But I can't find a wireless bridge/client to for my sons XBox / PS2.  Am I missing something?  Is there an N bridge/client to replace the DGL-3420 or DWL G810/G820?  :)
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: ddwinell on August 21, 2007, 08:04:32 AM
Not yet.
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: on August 21, 2007, 09:44:34 AM
What i would give for a N Ether/wifi transceiver
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: Lycan on August 21, 2007, 10:57:30 AM
The DAP-1555 is a dual-band 802.11n draft wireless bridge.

http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=570
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: GJones on August 22, 2007, 06:10:05 PM
The DAP-1555 is a dual-band 802.11n draft wireless bridge.

http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=570


The DAP-1555 doesn't appear to be out yet. The description made it sound like you needed 2, one to plug into the router and the other to the HD/Game boxes.  And the footnotes on the product desciption page leave me wondering if they are going to make their 3rd quarter release date.  It was supposed to be dual band, so what does the **footnote mean?

** Due to government regulations the 5.25~5.35GHz and 5.47~5.725GHz wireless bands are removed.

Anybody actually have one working as a client/bridge? 
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: on August 23, 2007, 09:19:22 AM
The DAP-1555 is a dual-band 802.11n draft wireless bridge.

http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=570


* What I would give for a 3x3 802.11N Transceiver


Ha, There is a picture of a Slingbox on the DAP-1555 network diagram
Title: Re: Hey, what happened to my 108 Super G?
Post by: Heracles on September 06, 2007, 01:58:23 PM
The DAP-1555 doesn't appear to be out yet. The description made it sound like you needed 2, one to plug into the router and the other to the HD/Game boxes.  And the footnotes on the product desciption page leave me wondering if they are going to make their 3rd quarter release date.  It was supposed to be dual band, so what does the **footnote mean?

** Due to government regulations the 5.25~5.35GHz and 5.47~5.725GHz wireless bands are removed.

Anybody actually have one working as a client/bridge? 

The footnote has to do with recent regulations requiring that 5 GHz devices (i.e. 802.11a, etc.) not use certain channels unless the hardware has been re-certified to comply with the new regulations.  Since the 5 GHz band has a bunch of channels available, the unused ones won't be missed.