D-Link Forums

The Graveyard - Products No Longer Supported => Routers / COVR => DIR-655 => Topic started by: rcschaff on March 30, 2009, 08:38:30 AM

Title: USB Port
Post by: rcschaff on March 30, 2009, 08:38:30 AM
Is there a way to connect to the usb hub like mapping the drive, so that I don't have to install the software that came with the router.

If so how do you do it?
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: EddieZ on March 30, 2009, 08:45:51 AM
No. Shareport is required to 'translate Ethernet-speak to USB-speak (and vv)'.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: rcschaff on March 30, 2009, 09:20:09 AM
I installed the software, I take it that you can only have 1 person connected to each device at a time?  From the looks of the manual it was showing a printer and a USB stick, so I take it you can install a USB HUB to the back of the router?
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: EddieZ on March 30, 2009, 12:41:18 PM
A USB hub is fine, but use a self powered one just to avoid issues.

his version will only allow one user per device, maybe a future version will allow multiple users. We hope it will at least :-)
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: Lycan on March 30, 2009, 12:54:12 PM
The 1.30 is a completely new animal.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: rcschaff on March 30, 2009, 01:37:44 PM
Another question, is this USB port on the back of the router considered a USB 2.0 port?
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: Lycan on March 30, 2009, 01:46:01 PM
Yes, but I wouldn't expect to see usb 2.0 speeds from it.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: EddieZ on March 30, 2009, 02:07:55 PM
Yes, but I wouldn't expect to see usb 2.0 speeds from it.


Due to the USB <=> Ethernet translations and hardware limitations (non-core activity for a router) that will affect USB port on every router. Just anticipating on the next question  ;D
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: EddieZ on March 30, 2009, 02:10:24 PM
The 1.30 is a completely new animal.

any testing samples yet for a happy few?
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: Lycan on March 30, 2009, 03:15:22 PM
They're being strict with it becuase of it's inablity to downgrade.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: lotacus on March 30, 2009, 08:30:36 PM
I'm weary that such an upgrade is actually going to end up being a "downgrade". Thinking that several functions are going to be nulled out preventing users from reverting to old firmware to get those functions back.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: Lycan on March 31, 2009, 08:52:51 AM
Then don't use it. :)

Guys its a firmware upgrade, if you don't want it you don't have to have it. We haven't taken anything away from the router, we simply changed the vendor for the shareport for greater functionality and reliability. If you don't want to use it you DO NOT have to.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: EddieZ on March 31, 2009, 09:56:37 AM
I am having faith in Dlink/Lycan for this version. So please don't disappoint me  ;)
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: Lycan on March 31, 2009, 10:11:06 AM
I haven't even used it, but the fact that it didn't get released as a beta says something about the level of scrutiny it's under.

Also I asked about making it downgrade-able. That was a big no-go.

IMHO, it's looking like we're trying to make this a final release, so that we can focus creating other firmwares for products that need attention.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: lotacus on March 31, 2009, 11:07:27 AM
yea, I was just throwing it out there. If the only thing that is honestly going to be changed is the shareport functionality, which seems quite odd to me to warrant the inability to downgrade, then it really isn't the risk to upgrade in case something goes terribly wrong, especially if your gateway is out of warranty, of course, that is if dlink is going to give a free product replacment if something shall go wrong since most issues can be resolved by re-flashing.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: EddieZ on April 01, 2009, 11:16:17 AM
took the words right out of my mouth.... Ah well, I can always buy some CAT5e  ;D

And the final version will mean...I'm about to be redundant... :'(
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: Lycan on April 01, 2009, 11:18:16 AM
I'm sure if you were to use the beta we'd honor your warranty.
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: fgl30 on April 06, 2009, 01:26:14 AM
I hope weŽll see BitTorrent client running directly into 655.....
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: EddieZ on April 06, 2009, 04:40:54 AM
I hope weŽll see BitTorrent client running directly into 655.....

I think your hopes are idle: the DIR is not built to facilitate such features (RAM, CPU, Ubicom platform). You really need a dedicated NAS (Synology etc) for those purposes. Even more, these features (the Ubicom OS does have more features than used in the router) will affect the router performance. Also, you don't launch these features in the final (last to come) firmware version that is coming up. If flawed only a bit it will destroy the credibility of brand and model without a chance of restoring the flaws. And software/firmware always has a flaw somewhere. Just a fact of life.  ;)
Title: Re: USB Port
Post by: fgl30 on April 10, 2009, 04:38:39 PM
That's a pity!!!! Think: we put a 64 Gb pendrive hooked in 655 and..... let it rock!!!!