• February 27, 2025, 07:59:38 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

This Forum Beta is ONLY for registered owners of D-Link products in the USA for which we have created boards at this time.

Author Topic: DNS-323 CPU usage vs. transfer speed  (Read 8598 times)

gunrunnerjohn

  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2717
DNS-323 CPU usage vs. transfer speed
« on: October 05, 2010, 09:11:58 AM »

In my system, I don't think there's any mystery why the access is pretty slow.

DNS-323 gigabit connection, no jumbo frames, running NAS Tester 4.0 writing/reading 5 passes of 200mb files.

With the processor maxed out on both read and write, it's small wonder it doesn't do better than it does!

Running warmup...
Running a 200MB file write on drive Y: 5 times...
Iteration 1:     9.73 MB/sec
Iteration 2:     11.31 MB/sec
Iteration 3:     11.46 MB/sec
Iteration 4:     11.47 MB/sec
Iteration 5:     11.58 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (W):     11.11 MB/sec
------------------------------
Running a 200MB file read on drive Y: 5 times...
Iteration 1:     12.48 MB/sec
Iteration 2:     12.25 MB/sec
Iteration 3:     12.91 MB/sec
Iteration 4:     12.58 MB/sec
Iteration 5:     12.69 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (R):     12.58 MB/sec
------------------------------





Reading CPU Usage





Writing CPU Usage


Logged
Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Remember: Data you don't have two copies of is data you don't care about!
PS: RAID of any level is NOT a second copy.

jamieburchell

  • Level 6 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 947
Re: DNS-323 CPU usage vs. transfer speed
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2010, 11:46:44 AM »

But does it mean bottleneck, or simply that the 323 is putting all spare CPU resources to the task?
Logged
If your little 323 is not working right,
You've racked your brains and been up all night
Take a deep breath and wipe away the sweat,
Login as web admin and try a factory reset!

gunrunnerjohn

  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2717
Re: DNS-323 CPU usage vs. transfer speed
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2010, 11:58:02 AM »

Well, if it's out of processor capacity, it's out of processor capacity. :)
Logged
Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Remember: Data you don't have two copies of is data you don't care about!
PS: RAID of any level is NOT a second copy.

dosborne

  • Level 5 Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 598
Re: DNS-323 CPU usage vs. transfer speed
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2010, 01:20:38 PM »

100% utilization doesn't mean out of capacity, it just means everything is allocated.
Logged
3 x DNS-323 with 2 x 2TB WD Drives each for a total of 12 TB Storage and Backup. Running DLink Firmware v1.08 and Fonz Fun Plug (FFP) v0.5 for improved software support.

gunrunnerjohn

  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2717
Re: DNS-323 CPU usage vs. transfer speed
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2010, 01:34:32 PM »

100% processor usage implies that faster transfers would take more than 100% of the available processor power.  We're not talking memory usage, but rather processor usage.  When you're out, you're out.  Note that a very large part of it is consumed by SAMBA.
Logged
Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Remember: Data you don't have two copies of is data you don't care about!
PS: RAID of any level is NOT a second copy.

stanchiam

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: DNS-323 CPU usage vs. transfer speed
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2010, 10:07:02 PM »

not sure if it is due to use old linux kernel, updating it to the latest will probably increased its speed since new kernel is more efficient and comes with better support for hardware.

Logged

gunrunnerjohn

  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2717
Re: DNS-323 CPU usage vs. transfer speed
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2010, 05:11:24 AM »

Could be, but I suspect that's beyond my capabilities, I think that's a D-Link task. :)
Logged
Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Remember: Data you don't have two copies of is data you don't care about!
PS: RAID of any level is NOT a second copy.