The drives in the DNS-321 format in EXT2 and do not really need to be defragmented as do not get fragmented as drives running FAT FAT32 and NTFS do. I would not worry about it too much davidwyatt6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe698/fe6985aa939ea19f2b6270c274cc70ecaaa6a4a9" alt="Roll Eyes ::)"
ECF,
I laugh out loud every time I see someone post that EXT2 does not really need to be defragmented. Just for kicks today, I backed up everything on my DNS-323, blew away everthing, and reformatted it as "individual disks". I then copied everything back twice, once to each Volume. Volume_1 was loaded with a 10 stream FTP copy. Volume_2 was loaded with a sequential 1 stream FTP copy. Would you like to guess which volume performed better and by how much? I was SHOCKED
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e908/5e9089d8b84e0cf039afad693bc832eb25959c6f" alt="Shocked :o"
to find that reading a 500 MB .mpg file took 3 times longer on Volume_1 than on Volume_2.
Please do not tell us how EXT2 does not fragment. Or are non-contiguous files not the same as fragmented?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d826d/d826d4cc9f2f6864b76473934b7e965cefa30e0e" alt="Grin ;D"
Cheers!
BSPVette