I installed the trial "Home" version of Acronis and it seems to do okay. I sensed a certain familiarity with something Apricorn and then on booting up the standalone CD, realized this is a superset of the EZ Gig II package I have used when upgrading my HDD. Almost identical but probably with some additional, useful features. I'm happy to report the CD has no problem with my Thinkpad's Broadcom ethernet adapter and appears ready to let me do whatever with images stored on the DNS-321. Haven't yet tried it with our two latest PCs (homebrews with Realtek-equipped Gigabyte boards). Still experimenting with and learning about other options.
The idea of backing up other networked PCs from one console still appeals but I'm new to all this even in WinXP and only casually familiar with the many tools of Linux, so it may be awhile before I figure how to use NAS-server (-client) apps in Ubuntu, etc etc. SelfImage seems able to let me do these things if/when I assimilate the basic understanding of how the NBD feature works.
Macrium Reflect also seems to show real promise, comparable to Acronis, but the bootup CD it let me create didn't seem quite as robust.
As mentioned earlier, I've also been playing around with SelfImage, which for its simplicity attracts me the most.
All three of these apps back up partitions to the DNS-321 over a gigabit connection at around 16-20 Mbytes/sec. They have write bursts that are at times unbelievable but I think that's all due to the compression algorithms they use. SelfImage backs up my Ubuntu partition (probably about 7 GB on a 153 GB partition) in 5-6 minutes, using medium compression and "skipping" unused sectors. It shows speeds 400-900 mbits/sec which I know is not happening, but it's extremely fast (to me) nonetheless.
Macrium (trial version) also moves bits at close to SelfImage speed, but one problem I face is, SelfImage apparently has no mechanism for on-the-fly verify and the trial-version Macrium requires that you verify after the image has been created (apparently the retail version at least lets you add verification to the image backup process but I wouldn't know if it's faster). In Macrium the verify process alone takes significantly longer than the image creation stage, maybe even double the time. Because SelfImage is open-source, I suppose someone with smarts could look under the hood so to speak and configure the compression engine to verify on-the-fly, but I am only speculating and have no idea whether this is actually possible. Perhaps someone could tell me whether or not it's even necessary.... Acronis presumably verifies backup images when it's finished creating them (but at least it does it).