Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[billo4th]

Hi,

I have three servers on the DMZ of my router, using NAT on the DMZ, with no problems.
I have a Surveillance Camera system connected to my LAN (192.168.1.x).
It is not physically near the router, so I can't connect it to the DMZ.
I have added SAT and Allow rules identical to the existing rules for my servers,
choosing the Camera IP in the SAT rule, and can't connect via the public ip
assigned to it. If I simply change the SAT destination IP to a server on the DMZ (172.17.100.x),
I can connect to that machine via the public IP.
What am I missing?

Bill

[lingnau]

Weird. It should work.
Did you set the correct network and gateway on the IP camera?
As a test I would suggest changing the SAT/Allow to SAT/NAT.

But I actually can't think about any reason why it shouldn't work. Did you try searching something in the log to see if it is being blocked by any rule?

[lucifer-tas]

Are you just trying to connect to the web interface of the camera or streaming media? Maybe the problem is with the port numbers used in the SAT rule. Is the firewall directing all http inbound traffic to the DMZ instead of the LAN to connect with the camera? Maybe define a different port number for the camera so that port xxxx on the wan interface gets directed to the camera port 80 on the lan.
Also can you connect to the camera from the LAN to test that the camera is working?
I'm just throwing ideas around. Maybe also use wireshark to look at where the packets are going (run it on a computer on the DMZ and a computer on the LAN).

[sergiomnt]

Hello,

Already configured a DFL in a topology similar to access the camera had to release some specific posts. quias were checked ports in the firewall logs.

Thank you.
Sérgio de Souza
sergio@masternet.com.br