I have had a DIR-655 (HW A4, FW 1.21) for a couple of years, but only using it to connect my laptop with a DWA-652. Not overly worried about speed, as long as it was faster than my previouos G wireless.
I'm running Windows Home Server (OEM) on a gigabit LAN. I use WHS to backup all machines (two desktops and a server) on my network every night.
Recently I decided to go completly wireless on all machines except for the WHS box. So the first thing I bought was an ASUS PCE-N13 PCI-X adapter for my "devel" machine which is running Windows 7 Home Premium. After running some transfer tests (using iperf) between this box and my WHS box, I noticed that I was not getting anywhere near "300 mbps" rated throughput. I read the "sticky" on speed and did not see anything in that doc that would affect me.
Anyway, using iperf I typically was getting a speed between 55 to 60 mbps. When running the same test using the gigabit LAN link, my speed was in the range of 260 to 270 mbps. So I thought it must be the ASUS adapter.
Yesterday, I went out a bought a D-Link DWA-552 PCI adapter and then re-ran the same tests. I was expecting a speed increase seeing as how both adapter and router were both D-Link products. This time however, my speed dropped to 48 to 51 mbps.
While I'm not using the latest firmware on the DIR-655 (heard too people had problems after doing an upgrade), I am using the lastest DWA-552 drivers.
When using the ASUS, I see a connection speed of only 150 mbps while the D-Link does see a connection speed of 300 mbps. Watching the wireless connections on the router shows that both devices connect to the router at between 88 and 90 percent (distance between router and client is 6 feet).
Watching the connection using task manager on the client shows that with the ASUS I'm getting around 42% network utilization while with the D-Link I only get 27% network utilization.
What is the best network throughput can I expect to get using the DIR-655 and how do I achieve this? I thought that with wireless-N I would get thoughput at least that of a 100 megabit network, but it appears that even that is not atainable.
Any ideas or suggestions would be appreciated.
Greg ...