• February 24, 2025, 01:22:48 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

This Forum Beta is ONLY for registered owners of D-Link products in the USA for which we have created boards at this time.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8

Author Topic: Permissions for "all"/anonymous  (Read 82924 times)

dlandon

  • Guest
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #45 on: January 06, 2009, 05:14:59 PM »

I have two WD drives of 250Gb each in a RAID 0 configuration.

Here are the non default settings:
- Static IP Address 192.168.1.2
- Jumbo frame 3000
- Wokrgroup MSHOME
- Name NetDrive
- 7 Users with passwords; no groups
- 7 user quotas set
- Quota Status Enabled
- Network Access settings with 9 sub-folders shared to ALL, including Volume_1 all set to R/W
- FTP Server started with 6 users in FTP access list
- iTunes Server enabled
- UPnP Server disabled
- Anonymous email alert; all alerts set

Hope this helps.
Logged

dlandon

  • Guest
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #46 on: January 11, 2009, 07:25:38 PM »

I can try that, but I won't be able to do that until this weekend.  I can't take the FTP Server off line during the week.

So I'll try this:
- Start with Firmware 1.01.
- Factory default settings.
- Downgrade to Firmware 1.00.
- Factory default settings.
- Upgrade to Firmware 1.01.
- Re-enter permissions and see if they will stay on re-boot.
- If they do, I will re-enter all other paramaters by hand and not re-load the saved configuration.

Tried this today.  Once I got back to the 1.01 Firmware I set permissions before anything was changed from the factory defaults and did a re-boot.  The permissions still dissapear on re-boot.  Did not change the problem at all.
Logged

NeilL

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #47 on: January 12, 2009, 12:20:38 PM »

No, this is not a solution to the problem, sorry.

I just spent about 2 hours on the phone with D-Link on this issue but a couple of items of note.

I opened an incident through the Web support form. After a couple of go rounds I got an email response saying to call.  So, I called and  after being on hold, talking to someone, being transferred, being on hold, escalating, etc. (typical of product support the around the world I think) I talked to a 3rd level support guy.  Nice fellow. After we discussed the issue several more times I asked him if this was a known issue with FW 1.01 and he replied that I was the first one to call about the issue. From reading this forum I find it hard to believe that no one else has opened a support incident here or talked to D-Link technical support but that is what he said. He then put me back on hold and said he had talked to the product manager…same type of response, “no, I was the first to call”.  I then pointed him to this forum entry and asked who the person from d-link was that was responding at various times to the thread…it was the product manager, so I guess we were playing the same parsing words game that our politicians use.
At the end of all that, he said to remove the 2nd drive and save the settings, restart and things should be saved. That did not work. Then the answer was to remove the drives, totally reformat the drives in a PC someplace and reinsert them and that should fix the problem. Since I don’t have any way to do that, I declined. He then said that they would try to recreate the issue in the lab. I told them that I had a perfectly good test device sitting on my desk and I’d be happy to exchange it with them if they were serious about fixing the issue…. They will get back to me on that one but I suspect d-link has not mechanism for doing that type of thing.

In any case, no resolution and no useful information from my couple of hours on the phone.  If it is true that no one else has submitted a support incident on this item or called, I would suggest that you all do so. My case Id is  DLK400045063 in case you want to reference that as a description of the issues.

On my box, what I did find was that after restarting the device all share permissions on the Network Access tab are missing. If I restart the box again, this time Volume_1 All users and the “All accounts” check box is displayed so I can add back my shares. This will continue to work until the box is restarted at which point I go through the process again.

For now I’m reverting to FW V1.00 and looking for a different NAS solution. Any suggestions on what I should try as an alternative to d-link products?

Neil
Logged

sandiegocal

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #48 on: February 25, 2009, 07:52:38 PM »

Just wondering if there was any other info from D-Link concerning this issue. I, too, had to revert back to firmware 1.00 because of this problem.

Shortly after I reverted, the D-Link unit signaled a failed drive in the RAID array. These two 320GB drives are only a couple of months old, and had been working fine up until 3 days ago when I began testing this unit. I remembered that I had been testing out all of the RAID functions, including building the RAID array, starting with a single drive, and then adding a second and reconfiguring as RAID. Apparently, the drive is working fine - I tested it on a Windows machine. But dropping back to v1.00 probably triggered the failure.

Anyway, I want to say to D-Link support that people write to this forum BECAUSE we want you to succeed. This product has real potential because of the price and lots of features. I am testing it for my customers (I am an IT consultant), but I would not risk my reputation by recommending this device at this point. It is just too buggy.

There are tons of us out here that would be glad to Beta test a new firmware. Why not put it out there for us?
Logged

JordiBoy

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #49 on: March 06, 2009, 08:08:25 PM »

Is D-Link doing anything to address the disappearing permissions on reboot or the disappearing “All Accounts” setting?  This has been a known issue for months and would be a showstopper for almost any other vendor.  The fact that this has not been fixed makes the product practically useless.  This will definitely be my last D-Link product.
Logged

ECF

  • Administrator
  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #50 on: March 10, 2009, 11:40:08 AM »

Yes this issue will be resolved in the next firmware release I have been told.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2009, 11:50:20 AM by ECF »
Logged
Never forget that only dead fish swim with the stream

bengoerz

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #51 on: June 05, 2009, 08:16:30 AM »

I just encountered this exact issue in a production environment. I tried to add a password-protected user for a network printer that would not accept anonymous credentials, only to find that the anonymous access for all my users was gone and unrecoverable. My office was without NAS access for 10 minutes while I restored from factory defaults.

I have had this unit for 1 day, and already this makes me want to return it. When is that new firmware coming out, darn it?!
Logged

JordiBoy

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #52 on: June 05, 2009, 09:01:24 AM »

Unfortunately, this problem still exists in the latest firmware version 1.03 build 7.  Don't know why I even try updated firmware or hold out hope that D-Link will resolve this problem.  It is *very* frustrating to have to reflash back to 1.0, flash back to the latest firmware version, and reset all the permissions.
Logged

ECF

  • Administrator
  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #53 on: June 05, 2009, 01:40:37 PM »

This issue will be fixed by the time 1.02 is released official it has high priority for the release.
Logged
Never forget that only dead fish swim with the stream

peas

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 47
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #54 on: June 05, 2009, 10:05:17 PM »

After we discussed the issue several more times I asked him if this was a known issue with FW 1.01 and he replied that I was the first one to call about the issue. From reading this forum I find it hard to believe that no one else has opened a support incident here or talked to D-Link technical support but that is what he said. He then put me back on hold and said he had talked to the product manager…same type of response, “no, I was the first to call”.  I then pointed him to this forum entry and asked who the person from d-link was that was responding at various times to the thread…it was the product manager, so I guess we were playing the same parsing words game that our politicians use.
Wow that's enlightening.. and saddening.  The "product manager" reads these forums, knows of the issue, but tried to wriggle out of it on a technicality (no one has "called" before).  Makes me lose faith in Dlink entirely.  Good thing there are other players in this market.
Logged

ECF

  • Administrator
  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #55 on: June 08, 2009, 09:36:57 AM »

Wow that's enlightening.. and saddening.  The "product manager" reads these forums, knows of the issue, but tried to wriggle out of it on a technicality (no one has "called" before).  Makes me lose faith in Dlink entirely.  Good thing there are other players in this market.

Yes it is a know issue and it will be fixed in the next firmware release. Nobody has tried to "wriggle" out of anything. We have not had a firmware release since 1.01 when this issue was first seen. Yes people have called on this issue and it has been tested and confirmed an issue to be fixed in the next official firmware release. I dont know how many times this has been mentioned.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2009, 09:38:41 AM by ECF »
Logged
Never forget that only dead fish swim with the stream

bengoerz

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #56 on: June 11, 2009, 03:37:03 PM »

ECF, I have sympathy that your team is putting a lot of work into bugfixes and Q&A before releasing updated firmware. But I am stuck with a NAS in a production environment that is afflicted by a high-priority issue that has been documented since at least Nov 11, 2008. I don't care about a lot of the new features in Beta (P2P Downloader, Yahoo! Widget, UPnP AV, etc.), which aren't even likely to increase sales of the DNS-321 because the official specs and packaging already exist. I just need an official-release firmware that is solid!
Logged

networker

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #57 on: June 22, 2009, 12:40:50 PM »

I have the same problem but I explained it in a different mannor.
http://forums.dlink.com/index.php?topic=5342.0

I hope that this is resolved in 1.03 (keeping my fingers crossed!)
Logged

bengoerz

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #58 on: July 31, 2009, 06:09:01 AM »

This "high priority" issue was not addressed in firmware 1.02 as promised. Come on D-Link! When is this going to get fixed?!   >:(
Logged

wren337

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Permissions for "all"/anonymous
« Reply #59 on: August 25, 2009, 05:49:58 PM »

Hi, I just picked up a dns-321 and flashed up to the latest beta code.  My smb share setup should allow anonymous access; I have a top level folder shared R/W to a named user, and a subfolder shared RO to "ALL".  It looks right in the security table.  When I try to mount the subfolder share it asks for credentials (XP, SP3).  The ALL setting doesnt seem to do anything.  When the security is reset I can mount the top folder R/W without credentials, but other than that default "share everything R/W" mode, anonymous sharing doesn't seem to work.  Does anyone have any voodoo that will get this working?  I hate to ship this thing back but I need anonymous RO shares.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8