No - I don't think your ISP is blocking a random port such as port 1026.
I'm really not inclined to repeat the hows and the whys of ftp another time - try searching this forumfor one of the other posts in which I have covered it.
Very briefly - when a non standard port is used, if the client is behind a NAT router, active ftp will fail because the client side firewall will block the data connection - you need to use passive ftp, which is not supported by the DNS-323.
I just noticed - my previous post has an omission - where I say the DNS-323 does not support ftp, the word passive was inadvertently omitted - passive ftp is not supported, only active ftp.
By the way - if your ISP blocks 21, it's probably because your TOS does not permit you to host an ftp server on that level of service.
Sorry if I am repeating something here but Dean you state that you tried using port 1026 instead of port 21. Was that on your router or your DNS-323?
I had problems accessing mine and like you my ISP was blocking port 21.
I used a different port on my router (say 1026) and setup port forwarding on the router to send anything coming in on '1026' to the internal IP of my DNS-323 (say 192.168.0.123).
On my DNS-323 I kept the port settings at 21 still.
What I'm saying is don't change the port settings on the DNS-323 but use a different port for the router and have the router port forward it to the DNS-323.
With that I was able to access my DNS-323 using either Filezilla or the web browser and on passive.
If this has already been mentioned or you've tried that already sorry. I hope you find a solution that works for you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5048/d5048affb276f7b418f039cacc31595253429416" alt="Embarrassed :-["
If this works... then HOORAY!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d826d/d826d4cc9f2f6864b76473934b7e965cefa30e0e" alt="Grin ;D"