You're looking at a relatively small Volume_2 there - it's not unusual for two drives of the same "nominal" capacity (even the same make & model) to have different capacities (although this is usually just a few megabytes, rather than the 2+ GB shown here)
If this were to happen, it is theoretically possible for the 321 to create the drive configuration shown here, even after the maximum available space was used for a RAID1 volume.
There is a "flip side" to this worth mentioning (and this is how I actually discovered this), if you had a failed drive and replaced it with one with just a few megabytes less capacity, the system would be unable to rebuild the array - this happened to me several years ago with a RAID1 pair in an IBM server, and was the cause of considerable head scratching as I was using supposedly identical drives - make, model & capacity - turned out that the replacement had 2MB less space than the one that had failed.
By the way - you should be able to see this at the format screen - when you enter the desired capacity, the unit should display any remaining space, before you click that final Next or Apply button.