• February 23, 2025, 03:24:41 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

This Forum Beta is ONLY for registered owners of D-Link products in the USA for which we have created boards at this time.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9

Author Topic: Time Frame?  (Read 84038 times)

chienpourri

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #60 on: August 20, 2009, 06:46:18 AM »

What's all the craze about NFS?  Can't you only use the standard file share like everyone else?  Works perfect for me...  I would vote to stop working on NFS if this can make the new firmware come out faster!
Logged

jeremy

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 45
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #61 on: August 20, 2009, 08:46:48 AM »

What's all the craze about NFS?  Can't you only use the standard file share like everyone else?  Works perfect for me...  I would vote to stop working on NFS if this can make the new firmware come out faster!
When you say "standard file share" I assume you are referring to SMB which is what microsoft uses. It works ok for machines running microsoft windows, but is, well, clumsy to say the least for people that use Linux. SMB does not suit my purposes, so I will not use it. Not a craze, just being practical.
Logged

jeremy

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 45
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #62 on: August 20, 2009, 08:49:29 AM »

We may be re-adding it. It is being looked into. It appears that we can stablize it...HOWEVER..theres a catch. If a user wants format their hard drives and they are running NFS, they will have to reboot the unit first. So far thats where its at and may be acceptable for a release. Will update you next week :).
That sounds fine to me, it would only be a minor inconvenience, certainly not a show-stopper. I am certainly looking forward to the release. Thanks.
Logged

Piotr

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #63 on: August 23, 2009, 08:14:06 AM »

There are more changes in new firmware:

  • HTTPS access:
  • Slot info (Right / Left):

Logged
DIR-655 H/W A2   FW 1.30EU    *    DSL-320B H/W D1  FW EU_1.21    *    DNS-323 H/W A1   FW 1.08b05    *    DWA-645 H/W A1

Tom

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #64 on: August 24, 2009, 02:15:55 AM »

Can the updated add-ons only be used with 1.08 b5, or also with the first 1.08 beta?
Logged

jeremy

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 45
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #65 on: August 28, 2009, 04:19:52 AM »

Well well, we are almost a month past the end of July, when 1.08 final was definitely going to be ready. Does anyone dare hazard an opinion as to when it may be released, with a working NFS plugin? Or should I just give up and go and buy (or build) a decent NAS instead?
Logged

armaniexchange

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #66 on: August 28, 2009, 05:30:38 AM »

So when on earth will the NEW firmware be released? It's taking way too long!
Logged

D-Link Multimedia

  • Poweruser
  • Level 7 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1066
    • D-link Systems, Inc.
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #67 on: August 28, 2009, 10:45:53 AM »

"Final" build arrived yesterday. Looking at a couple weeks of testing if no critical bugs are found. As to NFS, we have a new package that will release with the final code to support NFS.
Logged

nohelp

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 32
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #68 on: August 28, 2009, 10:55:33 AM »

"Final" build arrived yesterday. Looking at a couple weeks of testing if no critical bugs are found. As to NFS, we have a new package that will release with the final code to support NFS.

You're a brave person to put another time line out there.
Logged

D-Link Multimedia

  • Poweruser
  • Level 7 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1066
    • D-link Systems, Inc.
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #69 on: August 28, 2009, 12:12:31 PM »

Well if I don't have faith where does that put our customers at =P. Besides theres a clause in there "if no critical bugs are found"!
Logged

Piotr

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #70 on: August 28, 2009, 12:35:09 PM »

Any chances for S.M.A.R.T. support in the final firmware (like in DNS-321 and DNS-343) ?

My second question - what is the point of keeping built-in iTunes server (in the context of Firefly APKG package and limited flash space)?
Logged
DIR-655 H/W A2   FW 1.30EU    *    DSL-320B H/W D1  FW EU_1.21    *    DNS-323 H/W A1   FW 1.08b05    *    DWA-645 H/W A1

noem

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #71 on: August 28, 2009, 02:05:40 PM »

"Final" build arrived yesterday. Looking at a couple weeks of testing if no critical bugs are found. As to NFS, we have a new package that will release with the final code to support NFS.

That is great news indeed! :D:D:D
Logged

D-Link Multimedia

  • Poweruser
  • Level 7 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1066
    • D-link Systems, Inc.
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #72 on: August 28, 2009, 02:30:14 PM »

Any chances for S.M.A.R.T. support in the final firmware (like in DNS-321 and DNS-343) ?

My second question - what is the point of keeping built-in iTunes server (in the context of Firefly APKG package and limited flash space)?

SMART Wouldn't fit in the 8mb flash so we couldn't fit it. Possibly an addon later but we tend to stay away from things that mess with HD's when running from the HD.

Good question on the iTunes, I had not actually realized that the original one was still there ><. Get back to you on that one.
Logged

Piotr

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #73 on: August 28, 2009, 02:47:57 PM »

Maybe S.M.A.R.T. would fit in the 8mb flash if D-Link removes old iTunes server?
« Last Edit: August 28, 2009, 02:59:06 PM by Piotr »
Logged
DIR-655 H/W A2   FW 1.30EU    *    DSL-320B H/W D1  FW EU_1.21    *    DNS-323 H/W A1   FW 1.08b05    *    DWA-645 H/W A1

armaniexchange

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Re: Time Frame?
« Reply #74 on: August 28, 2009, 10:34:44 PM »

Well if I don't have faith where does that put our customers at =P. Besides theres a clause in there "if no critical bugs are found"!

Hmm, so it's within this week i believe it will be out?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9