Thanks, glad to be here
* Hardware version = 1.01NA
* Firmware version = 1.03NA
* Pacific, USA
* Wired (that's what I meant by "connected...WAN port", guess it could not have gone either way
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af375/af37530eb8a4d267fa3946a57cdbd261da5e4286" alt="Smiley :)"
ISP & MC
* DSL
* See the title of this post -> NetGear 7550 modem
* Both, currently dynamic
* 1U/7D Mbps, well below 100 Mbps.
* done many times in the past
* done several times in the past
* MTU - 1492
* ALWAYS on
* Yes, I know it is best to bridge them, hence the title of my post! I am not using 192.168.X.X since I have everything on my LAN assigned unique values. As stated the 7550 is MEANT to be bridged, and has an option for "routed bridged" (whatever they mean by that). Cannot set the NG on DMZ unless I use a LAN PORT on the DIR as I have done for years, and NO LONGER want to do so.
quote: "and put that into the modems DMZ."
What? You mean the D-Link router's IP, right?
At any rate, tried DMZ which picks up the IP from ISP and MAC from the D-Link and connects the two, even on the bridged connection - it does not work.
Not using DHCP. There are no IP conflicts, and AS STATED, tried different subnets:
"One doc suggested to put NG and DL on different subnets, i.e.:
DL IP = 192.168.0.x
NG IP = 192.168.1.x
"
Your last link points to a message where the image is broken and no longer available, but based on the comment is exactly what I am doing - trying to bridge these boxes. I know where to put in my credential and have already done so, the DL DIR-632 even connects to the NG 7550 and gets an IP, Gateway, DNSs listed, but there is NO iNet access! WHY ?!?
Under certain configurations, such as enabling VC2 on the NG to bridge then I get its iNet light on, thus service being provided to the NG, I sometimes get a good link to the DL but they get different IPs - thus no service to the DL because I am only paying for one and my ISP will not let me have another for free. After disabling the bridge on VC2, just now, they got the same IPs but still no service on the DL, and service on the NG went out shortly afterward. When I hit the PPP "connect" link on the NG, service restored but the both ended up with different IPs again.
NO, I am not trying to bridge wirelessly - I have a GOOD (tested with specific ethernet cable tester) cable connecting the two from the NG E1/uplink ethernet port to the D-Link WAN PORT!!! Please see the very first sentence of my original post. I cannot see why anyone would even try to bridge wirelessly.
The D-Link should be the main host router, the way D-Link has it set up to be. Please see the second sentence of my original post. I just need the NG to use its phase lock loop to demodulate the HF DSL signal and to transduce that to ethernet (i.e. the modem portion), the D-Link should take over from there.
Does this answer your questions?
Thank you for your response, moderator Nutz. but I need something deeper than this. What are the possible causes for the first error message:
"Feb 7 11:01:12 rp_pppoe =' read pppoe_conn_session error or firs
t time dial"
How can I force the DL to get the same IP (& GW, DNSs) as the NG gets in a bridged mode (and, you know, have them bothe get service)?