Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[amphiprion]

Downloading from official site or 3rd party?

I have tested this over and over but can not duplicate what you are posting about.

I have only downloaded it from the official site @ www.utorrent.com.  On another installation, I may have used CNet.  Both are legit and both gave the same results, unfortunately.

I think buddy has issues differentiating legit software and sources from malicious ones. Wouldn't be suprised if his entire system is FUBAR.

utorrent doesn't display that "nag" screen.

With all due respect, I take offense.  It is very unfair to make assumptions like that.  I at least know enough not to download from sketchy sites.  Any and all software I download comes directly from the respective official source (or CNet).

That being said, the nag screen is indeed there .  You just aren't looking for it or didn't pay attention to it.

The nag screen is shown when Windows has marked the exe as untrusted.

You can see this by right clicking on the exe and then properties and you will see an "unlock" button.

Does not happen every time though and yes it is very annoying.

It's been like this for years:

http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=9397

Of course it is "suppose" to be shown only once but it's not. I get it like evey 10 runs or so, but never every 10, so it's random.

I had found that thread when I started using utorrent a few years ago when I had Vista.  I tried the same thing on both Vista and my newer installation of Windows 7, but I always get the same result, unfortunately, since it reappears when I start it back up.  Ah, and thank you for being civil in light of the above comment.

[amphiprion]

Hmm, something else I noticed was that the version of Vuze I have is no longer up to date.  They apparently came out with a newer version a bit over a month ago.  I disable automatic updates, so I didn't really even think about it.  I'll try installing the new version and reporting here.

[amphiprion]

It's no good.  I tried uTorrent on another computer on the network to try out UPnP and it worked just fine.  Other apps on the same computer with Vuze also work fine.  I guess I'm going to have to assume it's a problem between the compatibility between Vuze and the DIR-655.

[Cobra]

Vuze-Having problems with UPnP?

[amphiprion]

Already ahead of you  .  Thanks again for all the help.  I'm at least glad to know it isn't the router.

[war59312]

Are you using an old version?

The algorithm that checks for this has been changed as of the 1.8 builds.

Also, µTorrent 2.0 was just released recently.

Not sure why but the only time I have ever seen this was years ago after the first install.
Since then I just import my setting when I install.

I'm an update/beta freak of nature.

Everything on my system is either the latest release version or latest beta/alpha.

So yes I'm running uTorrent 2.1 build 18148. And yes it also happens with the final 2.0 build.

So no it's not fixed and probably never will be.  

[pbodq]

I have Azureus/Vuze as a P2P client and it can test, more accurately than most, whether or not ports are properly opened.  Normally, this isn't a problem, but after 1.33NA, UPnP will go down and the router has to be restarted.  I may downgrade to 1.31NA like I did from 1.32NA, but what do you guys think?  Anyone else having the same issue?  I have the UPnP service, etc. marked as automatic in Windows 7 HP x64.

I have the similar situation as yours.
1.33NA + WinXP SP3 + uTorrent 2.0 17920(official stable release, not the beta)

Under 1.32 build 9, the uTorrent 2.0 UPNP could run for 1x days smoothly without any DIR-655 reboot or PC reboot.

After I updated to 1.33NA, UPNP cannot be used AFTER the uTorrent 2.0 continuously ran for 3-4 days.
I did a soft reboot on DIR-655 1.33NA, nothing happens.
I want to point out that the DIR-655's 1.33NA UPNP stops working after CERTAIN days or CERTAIN accumulated throughput.

Don't ask me stupid question about confirming the 2 Windows related services or the DIR-655 UPNP web option are whether on or off.
However, I discover an odd thing that the web UPNP check box in DIR-655 is unchecked after a soft reboot. No one has entered the web page because i am the only owner of it, so I doubt whether DIR-655 shuts its UPNP down automatically when something is triggered.


Honestly, I have switched some critical options after I updated to 1.33NA. This maybe the cause but it should not be. Otherwise, it is a serious bug.
Here is the important options comparison between current 1.33NA setting and the previous 1.32 build 9 setting

	1.32 build9	1.33NA
QoS page	off	on + traffic shaping on + manual 100000 + manual cable + 3 boxes on in the middle
SPI	on	on
Anti-spoof	on	on
Endpoint filter	highest restricted	highest restricted
Securespot	on	off
Anti-spoof	on	on
DNS relay	on	on
NTP	D-link server	D-link server
Syslog	off	off
MAC access Filter	off	off
HTTPS	on	off
RemoteManagement	on	off
Multicast	on	on
Wireless	off	off

Of course, I can switch them back into 1.32build 9 status.
So, wait me for another 10 days and the truth will be out.

[EddieZ]

Running all beta/alpha also, but no issues here.

[Cobra]

QoS page off on + traffic shaping on + manual 100000 + manual cable + 3 boxes on in the middle

100000 kbps would be 100 mbps.

Are you sure your upload speed is that fast?

A rate that high could be what is killing your connection after a while.

I have 2Mbps upload which is only about 2048 kbps.

[pbodq]

100000 kbps would be 100 mbps.

Are you sure your upload speed is that fast?

A rate that high could be what is killing your connection after a while.

I have 2Mbps upload which is only about 2048 kbps.

yes, my Internet Service Provider can serve me a 100Mbit WAN speed(Actually, her port is Gigabit but locked at 100). She promises that local connection can reach at least 80Mbit but 20Mbit max for foriegn connections.

For example, I always get 10-11 MByte/s when I download patches from local Microsoft site or  local nVidia site.It can be done in few seconds.

For my uTorrent application, most of the connections are in foriegn countries. Most of the time, the upload speed is 1-2MByte/s. Of course, the speed burst to 8-9MByte/s when I find a local user who subscribes to the same ISP. The job could be finished within several minutes.

[pbodq]

10 high traffic days passed.

Using 1.33NA with old 1.32 b09 setting without any UPnP problem.

It implies that the following item(s) cause the problem

QoS page on
Securespot off
HTTPS off
RemoteManagement off