• February 27, 2025, 04:58:41 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

This Forum Beta is ONLY for registered owners of D-Link products in the USA for which we have created boards at this time.

Author Topic: NFS vs SMB  (Read 9692 times)

JKwan

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
NFS vs SMB
« on: February 22, 2010, 08:20:33 AM »

I am not familiar with either of the file system.  I think by default the 323 uses SAMBA (SMB?) file system.  So, is there advantage of running Network File System (NFS?).  I mean there were lots of conversation about NFS, so what is the real deal with NFS, is it that much better over SMB?  Also, are all the bugs been shaken out of NFS?  I downloaded the addon, installed it, but I had not activated it.  I figured that I should understand the topic more, before I venture into the "unknown".

Thanks.
Logged

gunrunnerjohn

  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2717
Re: NFS vs SMB
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2010, 08:22:14 AM »

If you're working with Windows machines, save some headaches and just use SMB, it's the standard for Windows. 
Logged
Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Remember: Data you don't have two copies of is data you don't care about!
PS: RAID of any level is NOT a second copy.

JKwan

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: NFS vs SMB
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2010, 01:36:52 PM »

OK.
Thanks for the advice.  I will stick with SMB
Logged

pkarlos_76

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: NFS vs SMB
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2010, 08:47:08 AM »

does NFS work better for MACS?
Logged

gunrunnerjohn

  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2717
Re: NFS vs SMB
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2010, 08:56:02 AM »

Given that a number of people have issues with NFS for any environment with this box, I'd have to say that would not be likely. :)
Logged
Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Remember: Data you don't have two copies of is data you don't care about!
PS: RAID of any level is NOT a second copy.

irotjaf

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: NFS vs SMB
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2010, 10:28:49 AM »

Help my ignorance please. I've never understood this samba thing. Isn't the filesystem ext2 or ext3 what we use? Why people talk about samba and mamba :)
Logged

gunrunnerjohn

  • Level 11 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2717
Re: NFS vs SMB
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2010, 10:46:48 AM »

SAMBA is Linux SMB protocol handler, and it's the standard file sharing mechanism for Windows based machines.  The underlying filesystem isn't germane to the discussion of how file information is transferred across the network.  NFS is simply a different file sharing protocol that is also supported if desired on Linux, Mac, and Windows, it's just not the default for Windows.
Logged
Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Remember: Data you don't have two copies of is data you don't care about!
PS: RAID of any level is NOT a second copy.