Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[extrememc]

I am wanting a clear explanation of how I can setup QOS or portforwarding between my NAS and Internet to my Western Digital TV Live. Ever device on my network is static and have been reserved in the DHCP table.

[EddieZ]

I am wanting a clear explanation of how I can setup QOS or portforwarding between my NAS and Internet to my Western Digital TV Live. Ever device on my network is static and have been reserved in the DHCP table.

Have you read the HELP section in the setup? What is unclear after reading that?

[extrememc]

If I put the ip address of my wireless adapter in the local IP Range 192.xxx.x.xxx then my NAS Remote IP Range 192.xxx.x.xxx. This will give my Western Digital Live TV which is connect to the wireless adapter a direct path to the NAS. Am I correct in my thinking?

[StarkRG]

I'm having trouble understanding what you're trying to do and what problem you're having doing it.
Intranet (as in local network, not Internet) connections are not affected at all by portforwarding, and I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't affected by QOS either. If you're trying to access your NAS from outside your network (ie, accross the Internet) you'll probably have to manually forward its port (QOS probably won't make that much of a difference with it).

[extrememc]

What I want to do is make sure my WD TV Live has a direct path thru the router to the NAS so there is not lag or any drops to the WD TV Live.

[StarkRG]

If they're both connected to the same network (with the same subnet) there is nothing more you have to do (unless you've put up VLANs or network partitions, but these are disabled by default).

[extrememc]

Are you say just put in the appropriate IP address in the table of the QOS and that will give me the direct path?

[davevt31]

QOS settings only effect traffic that is going out the WAN port, it will not have any effect LAN traffic.

[youbevun]

can't it be coded with the given SDK like this:
for example i give multiplayer online game priority 1 and port 80 two.the router than sends to wan 2 packets for game and 1 packet for port 80.if i add another rule to those two.for example bittorrent with the priority 3.than the packet distribution that must be sent to wan will be like this: 6 packets for game,3 packets for web and 2 packets for torrent.can it be coded or the qos algorithm is coded in the cpu and can't be changed?

[EddieZ]

can't it be coded with the given SDK like this:
for example i give multiplayer online game priority 1 and port 80 two.the router than sends to wan 2 packets for game and 1 packet for port 80.if i add another rule to those two.for example bittorrent with the priority 3.than the packet distribution that must be sent to wan will be like this: 6 packets for game,3 packets for web and 2 packets for torrent.can it be coded or the qos algorithm is coded in the cpu and can't be changed?

I wonder why you want it changed your way? The currently used system is easy to understand for both novice and expert. So what's the reason for a new system?

Perhaps you can try your skills on a Linux router. That one you can reprogram (with the right skills).

[youbevun]

I wonder why you want it changed your way? The currently used system is easy to understand for both novice and expert. So what's the reason for a new system?

Perhaps you can try your skills on a Linux router. That one you can reprogram (with the right skills).

this cpu is sligthly different from those mips ones.i don't want them to waste its features with high-cost or inefficient algorithms.if this forum doesn't go to a bright end;it doesn't seem to be happened,i will say and this is allready the real;open source allways has a good future than closed one. 

[EddieZ]

this cpu is sligthly different from those mips ones.i don't want them to waste its features with high-cost or inefficient algorithms.if this forum doesn't go to a bright end;it doesn't seem to be happened,i will say and this is allready the real;open source allways has a good future than closed one. 

You could ofcourse apply for a job with Dlink.
And you could start by telling us what the current algorythm is and why it is inefficient for this CPU...That way we can have a real indepth discussion.

[StarkRG]

Are you say just put in the appropriate IP address in the table of the QOS and that will give me the direct path?

What I'm saying is don't do anything at all and you have a direct path. As in, when you plug something into the router it has a direct path to EVERYTHING else that's plugged into the router. The same is true for wireless connections unless you've enabled LAN partitioning.

[extrememc]

@StrakRG Ok I got you there. Can I use this service to better my connection with my Magicjack? Since this service is strictly a Wan port feature.