youngs,
i flashed back to v.1 because i got the impression was that wireless was working better,
here are the results of nas performance with v.1:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 10.356 MB/s
Sequential Write : 8.440 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 10.672 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 8.905 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.005 MB/s [ 733.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 2.138 MB/s [ 521.9 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 2.999 MB/s [ 732.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 1.394 MB/s [ 340.4 IOPS]
Test : 50 MB [X: 5.6% (12.8/229.2 GB)] (x2)
Date : 2010/08/01 10:31:43
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x86)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 10.039 MB/s
Sequential Write : 8.317 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 10.753 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 8.886 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 2.942 MB/s [ 718.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.612 MB/s [ 393.5 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 2.860 MB/s [ 698.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 1.427 MB/s [ 348.3 IOPS]
Test : 50 MB [X: 5.6% (12.8/229.2 GB)] (x1)
Date : 2010/08/01 9:55:00
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x86)
i never had such results! very good ones!
i did what p0enix suggested changed to the newest ethernet cable and also suddently i had 1000Mbps FULL Duplex
shown on the dir-685 and the pc also!
there is no logic behind this v.1 test!
should be better with the v.2!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba1a2/ba1a22cc9ec81e7b34786befb4a0455f4ea57c90" alt="Huh ???"