• October 31, 2024, 08:34:58 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

This Forum Beta is ONLY for registered owners of D-Link products in the USA for which we have created boards at this time.

Author Topic: HDs  (Read 7102 times)

Picchio

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
HDs
« on: December 05, 2012, 06:04:11 AM »

Hi all

just ordered the Station, now I'm searching for 2 2TB HDs...

what about HDs rpm ?

I'm studiyng the WD20EARX but it is a 5400rpm .....
Do you think a 7200rpm is better for Media Service and, in the meantime, robust enough ?

over the internet I found both pros and cons... but more pros...

Experiences?
 
thx
Logged

Doctor Doom

  • Level 3 Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: HDs
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2012, 11:43:25 AM »

The price difference between 5400 and 7200RPM's is negligible. If you were to put in 5400's vs 7200 the transfer speed would be identical. I would just go with what's on sale.



Logged

sbrbot

  • Level 2 Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: HDs
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2013, 01:34:51 AM »

I can say something about commonly used Western Digital drives: WD has several flavors of its hard drives:

  • Blue - mass-market - intended for mass market desktops/worstations (e.g. WD10EALX,WD10EAEX)
  • Green - economic - intended for desktops/worstations with lower consumption (e.g. WD10EARX, WD10EZRX)
  • Red - durability - dedicated for NAS devices (e.g. WD10EFRX)
  • Black - heavy-duty - intended for servers (e.g. WD1002FAEX)

So if you intend to run your NAS 24/7 you should invest money in red drives (3 years warranty). They are silent, and have low consumption like green ones. If you don't need 24/7 then green ones (2 years warranty) fit well too. I bought 2x2TB green ones (WD20EARX) and they work fine. EARX are little bit slower (110MB/s) than EZRX (126MB/s) drives but work more silently and with lower consumption. However, I think that nobody should bother himself too much about speed (you will not reach this speed anyway in your NAS, no way), and differences between consumptions are really nothing, etc. Silent work, warranty, capacity (of course) and finally price - do matter.

If you want to compare and choose, maybe this helps: WD hard drives matrix comparison
Logged

JavaLawyer

  • BETA Tester
  • Level 15 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12190
  • D-Link Global Forum Moderator
    • FoundFootageCritic
Re: HDs
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2013, 05:51:07 AM »

sbrbot -- Thank you for the summary. Good post  ;)
Logged
Find answers here: D-Link ShareCenter FAQ I D-Link Network Camera FAQ
There's no such thing as too many backups FFC

Picchio

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: HDs
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2013, 10:40:34 PM »

thx everybody  :)
Logged

JavaLawyer

  • BETA Tester
  • Level 15 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12190
  • D-Link Global Forum Moderator
    • FoundFootageCritic
Re: HDs
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2013, 05:55:44 AM »

  • Blue - mass-market - intended for mass market desktops/worstations (e.g. WD10EALX,WD10EAEX)
  • Green - economic - intended for desktops/worstations with lower consumption (e.g. WD10EARX, WD10EZRX)
  • Red - durability - dedicated for NAS devices (e.g. WD10EFRX)
  • Black - heavy-duty - intended for servers (e.g. WD1002FAEX)

I've added this information to the HDD Compatibility list sticky thread.
Logged
Find answers here: D-Link ShareCenter FAQ I D-Link Network Camera FAQ
There's no such thing as too many backups FFC