I am curious about the stability and performance with the DNS-323 during heavy, continuous use.
I'm currently running a PC with XP as a fileserver. It's running two 1TB Seagate drives in a RAID1. It serves my main machine and other computers throughout my house. There are issues with the OS hard drive and I'm convinced the SATA controller the on the motherboard itself is starting to go, so I'm looking to replace it relatively soon.
Instead of replacing the OS hard drive and the motherboard I would like to use a DNS-323; it would be far less work to configure, one less image to maintain, etc. I am already running one for my media with two 1.5TB Seagate drives in RAID1, but its usage would be far less than this new one I would like to put up.
I run everything across the network from the file server. Pretty much anything that can be stored off my main machine is on there. Pictures, videos, music, documents, computer images, virtual machines, etc. And I open/edit them all across the network. I would be using the same two 1TB drives in the D-LINK and I would be running in a RAID1.
I am curious what the performance would be like versus the PC, and how stable it would be. I've heard of issues where the RAID will degrade randomly. I can't afford to have my array continually rebuilt or my data compromised. I of course have my most critical stuff backed up to an external drive, but I would rather avoid the hassle and downtime.
Are there any recommendations or suggestions? Should I just stick to my current setup and replace my hardware, or would it be better if I moved to a DNS-323? Any advice would be appreciated, thank you.