If the data is that important you need a good backup strategy in place. A storage device and only one copy of the data is not a backup, you need at least three copies of the data as well as the original to have a secure backup (RAID storage is NOT a backup).
Hi,
Yes indeed it was a bad strategy. On paper it seemed to us sufficient for a particular person because the backup of NAS to NAS separated by hundreds of kilometers avoided the risk of fire and theft. It was wrongly thought that 2 nas and their records could not break down in the same hour. While waiting to think of another solution using a NAS, I returned to a simpler method for me: cloud + External Disk + DVD.
The data up to this day seemed important but not vital but when it contains the only photos of a loved one disappeared suddenly we reconsider the importance of this data.
Fortunately for me, I had inserted these photos in a personal blog, in very average quality but it is always that.
The multiplication of backup media and their places of storage is certainly the best solution but it is often thought too late for a single individual.
I recommend that you phone contact your regional D-Link support office and ask for help and information regarding this. We find that phone contact has better immediate results over using email.
Let us know how it goes please.
I will indeed try to call them, I had made an email, but no longer under warranty I do not know if they will reply.
I would just like to have two pieces of information:
- Confirm that the disk formatted as "standard" in the NAS should be readable in Linux as Ext3 format. Because if this is the case, it confirms my request for recovery by a specialized company.
- Have an idea of what could happen to destroy 2 NAS and alter 2 disks remote at the same time yet distant hundreds of kilometers while the synchronization of the 2 NAS is only a week apart.